Farm Action Urges USDA to Modernize Outdated Processing Size Definitions
Today, in response to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Farm Action submitted a public comment urging the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) to update how it classifies the size of meat, poultry, and egg processors, arguing that the current definitions no longer reflect the realities of today’s industry.
Currently, FSIS largely determines a processing facility’s size based on employee count. That classification then shapes regulatory requirements, food safety inspections, and access to federal resources. According to farmers and processors in Farm Action’s network, that approach no longer accurately reflects the scale or capacity of modern processing operations, particularly in an industry shaped by automation and consolidation.
This outdated method imposes disproportionate burdens on independent small-scale operations and can limit access to grants, exemptions, and other support programs by treating them the same as highly automated facilities or plants owned by large multinational corporations with far greater resources.
“Two facilities with comparable workforce sizes may process dramatically different product volumes depending on their level of automation, processing technology, and operational structure. In practice, employee-based metrics often obscure rather than clarify the actual scale of operations,” Farm Action wrote in its comment.
Farm Action urged FSIS to update establishment size definitions to better account for production volume, corporate ownership structures, and the actual compliance capacity of processing facilities.
The organization also called for more detailed size categories to create a more accurate classification system and better distinguish independent processors from facilities operating under large corporate ownership.
The organization said these proposed updates would help ensure federal resources and oversight are better aligned with the actual scale and capacity of processing facilities while improving support for independent processors.
Cal-Maine reported roughly $1.2 billion in profits during the egg price spike, yet this settlement lets dominant egg producers treat alleged price fixing as the cost of doing business rather than real accountability.
“This ruling weakens protections for farmers, farmworkers, and the public, and it sets a dangerous precedent for other corporations seeking similar immunity,” said Farm Action President Angela Huffman.
Farm Action Urges USDA to Modernize Outdated Processing Size Definitions
Today, in response to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Farm Action submitted a public comment urging the USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) to update how it classifies the size of meat, poultry, and egg processors, arguing that the current definitions no longer reflect the realities of today’s industry.
Currently, FSIS largely determines a processing facility’s size based on employee count. That classification then shapes regulatory requirements, food safety inspections, and access to federal resources. According to farmers and processors in Farm Action’s network, that approach no longer accurately reflects the scale or capacity of modern processing operations, particularly in an industry shaped by automation and consolidation.
This outdated method imposes disproportionate burdens on independent small-scale operations and can limit access to grants, exemptions, and other support programs by treating them the same as highly automated facilities or plants owned by large multinational corporations with far greater resources.
“Two facilities with comparable workforce sizes may process dramatically different product volumes depending on their level of automation, processing technology, and operational structure. In practice, employee-based metrics often obscure rather than clarify the actual scale of operations,” Farm Action wrote in its comment.
Farm Action urged FSIS to update establishment size definitions to better account for production volume, corporate ownership structures, and the actual compliance capacity of processing facilities.
The organization also called for more detailed size categories to create a more accurate classification system and better distinguish independent processors from facilities operating under large corporate ownership.
The organization said these proposed updates would help ensure federal resources and oversight are better aligned with the actual scale and capacity of processing facilities while improving support for independent processors.
Media Contact: Lucy Sears, [email protected], 202-853-5510
RECENT NEWS
How Farm Action Cracked the Corporate Egg Price Gouging Scheme
We exposed corporate price gouging in the egg industry, leading to federal investigations, proposed legislation, and lower egg prices for families.
DOJ Egg Settlement Falls Short of Accountability
Cal-Maine reported roughly $1.2 billion in profits during the egg price spike, yet this settlement lets dominant egg producers treat alleged price fixing as the cost of doing business rather than real accountability.
Supreme Court Sides With Bayer-Monsanto, Shields Pesticide Companies From Accountability
“This ruling weakens protections for farmers, farmworkers, and the public, and it sets a dangerous precedent for other corporations seeking similar immunity,” said Farm Action President Angela Huffman.