Supreme Court Showdown: Farmers’ Rights vs. Corporate Power
As the Supreme Court weighs Bayer-Monsanto’s challenge to Roundup lawsuits, farmers’ ability to hold powerful corporations accountable hangs in the balance.
As the Supreme Court weighs Bayer-Monsanto’s challenge to Roundup lawsuits, farmers’ ability to hold powerful corporations accountable hangs in the balance.
America’s food system didn’t become dominated by a handful of corporations by accident—it was built by design.
A new USDA rule closes a policy loophole that allowed imported meat to receive the “Product of USA” label.
As a farmer-led watchdog, Farm Action challenged corporate power, pressed policymakers, and elevated farmers’ voices to build a fairer food system in 2025.
Checkoff dollars claim to help producers. In reality, they entrench corporate control, siphon farmers’ wealth, and fuel the system driving them out of business.
Grocery retail is now one of the most consolidated parts of the U.S. food chain, with just four corporations controlling 69% of the market.
The Department of Justice’s investigation is a welcome first step. But if policymakers are serious about standing up to abusive corporate power, they must go beyond an inquiry.
Just two companies—John Deere and CNH Industrial—control nearly 90% of the U.S. markets for large tractors and combines, harming farmers and rural communities.
Just three companies—Nutrien, Mosaic, and CF Industries—dominate the North American fertilizer market, wielding near-total control over supply and prices.
Beneath the headlines about trade wars and bailouts lies a deeper truth: America’s agricultural system is structurally flawed.