Reposted from: https://www.newsweek.com/rfk-farming-agriculture-maha-food-usda-2118957
A nonpartisan national farm organization claiming to be the only such group to have endorsed Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to head the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has given a preliminary “Make America Healthy Again” draft a “D+” grade, cautioning of lobbyists’ influence and avoiding antitrust action on monopoly powers in broader food production.
The HHS referred Newsweek to the White House when reached for comment on Monday afternoon.
Why It Matters
The conservative-led MAHA strategy touches on various facets of agriculture, including overhauling the entire food system, in addition to tackling national concerns centered around vaccines, children’s mental health and screen time, and reforming chemical and environmental safety standards.
On February 13, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14212, “Establishing the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission,” presented as a “call to action…to unpack the potential dietary, behavioral, medical, and environmental drivers” attributing to American children’s declining health.
The order pledged to produce a report within 100 days of the order going into effect.
What To Know
Farm Action, a nonpartisan, farmer-led watchdog organization that advocates for accountability from the government and large corporations within the agricultural sector, rated the contents of a recent leaked draft of the MAHA strategy a “D+,” saying, “It recognizes some of the right priorities and even overlaps with our recommendations in places, but the execution is timid and avoids the structural reforms needed to truly deliver on the MAHA Commission’s own diagnosis of the problem.”
The organization, in a statement made on August 18, said MAHA’s April assessment called out systemic issues like corporate capture and consolidation in the food system, chemical contamination in agriculture, and federal programs like crop insurance that drive production of commodity crops over healthy foods.
“But between April and August, the White House met with powerful lobbyists—and the influence shows,” Angela Huffman, president of Farm Action, said in a statement last week. “The draft avoids antitrust action on monopoly power in food production, processing and retail. While it nods to soil health, it punts on pesticide dependence—offering only ‘precision application’ and reassurances to lobbyists instead of a real transition plan.”
She continued: “It also leaves crop insurance and subsidy distortions untouched, keeping fruit and vegetable growers at a disadvantage. Overall, it’s a far cry from the bold promises of structural reform made on the campaign trail.”
Huffman told Newsweek via phone on Monday that the April assessment was “very bold” in tackling issues at the root of the problem, such as corporate capture, reducing chemical dependence, and fixing farm programs that heavily subsidized commodity crops like corn and soybeans.
“We really applauded that assessment,” she said. “But the problem—I think that assessment was done in good faith and it was done without industry influence because after it came out, corporate industrial agriculture interest raised hell about it, that they had not been at the table. The White House committed to hearing their feedback as they developed the strategy document.”
Huffman added: “That’s what happened between April and this August strategy. This leaked draft really walks back that ambition after the White House met with food and Ag [agriculture] executives. And it sidesteps these critical structural issues. The bottom line is that farmers and families deserve a final version of this report that matches the scale of the problems that we face.”
In mid-August, a leaked draft showed that the long-term strategy of Kennedy Jr. and Trump administration veers from policy recommendations and instead urges more research on nutrition, agricultural chemicals, and “potential benefits of select high-quality supplements,” among other topics, according to STAT News, a health and medicine-focused media company.
The first MAHA report discussed potential links between pesticides and childhood diseases. The newest draft report instead describes the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) pesticide reviews as “robust” while also supporting technological research to minimize pesticide use rather than recommend new restrictions on pesticides.
Huffman said the latest draft, which could still be altered before completion, was “not a surprise but disappointing.”
“I understand how this works and how it’s worked for decades in Democrat and Republican administrations,” she said. “Corporate lobbyists have a lot of influence. I think a lot of people got their hopes up reading that April assessment, that it really did shut out that industry influence.”
Huffman and Farm Action note positive aspects that transferred from the April draft to the latest one, including easing barriers for CSAs (Consumer Supported Agriculture) and direct-to-consumer sales; improving farm-to-school grants; supporting small meat processors and mobile units; and expanding voluntary soil health programs—some of the steps Farm Action initially recommended to the MAHA Commission.
“But these scattered measures are thin on detail and overshadowed by the reluctance to take on reforms at the scale of the problem,” the organization said in its August 18 statement.
Huffman also said the administration’s support of small meat processors and mobile processing units was a good sign and welcomed by the farming community.
“They’re not large structural [changes], they’re not addressing these bigger problems of consolidation in the food system and the way farm subsidies are driving unhealthy practices,” she said. “These are positive steps; there’s not a lot of detail behind them for me to really say how far that would go and what those will really look like.
“But I think that unless they change the bigger system that farmers are operating in, these are not going to have a huge impact. It’s just a little bit around the edges….That said, these could be good things and we’ll see. We’re waiting for the final report to come out but those were places we wanted to be fair. Those are places that there’s a chance that that they might do something good.”
What People Are Saying
Kari Hamerschlag, deputy director of the food and agriculture program at the nonprofit Friends of the Earth, said in an August 18 statement, according to the Advisory Board: “This is not going to transform our food and farming system. This is not going to make people healthier. They need to put resources behind their recommendations.”
Gary Brecka, the host of a wellness podcast influential in the MAHA movement, in a statement, per The New York Times: “We’d love to see broad sweeping legislation that outlaws some of these chemicals. If you’re Health and Human Services or the Department of Agriculture, you also have to realize the impact — not just financially, but the impact that this would make on the food supply having to shift gears so quickly.”
David Murphy, a former Kennedy Jr. fundraiser, in a statement, per The New York Times: “We didn’t come here because we want food dyes out of Froot Loops. We came here because we want a fundamental rewriting of our food and ag policy.”
David Kessler, former FDA commissioner, in a statement, per The New York Times: “Secretary Kennedy has an extraordinary opportunity to dramatically improve the quality of the food supply and lives of Americans. What he does is considerably more important than what any report says.”
What Happens Next
It remains unclear when the final version of the MAHA strategy will be finalized. The leaked draft and final edition may drastically differ once edits are made.
Groups like Farm Action are holding out on rescinding endorsements until long-term details and goals are clarified.


