Joe Maxwell, co-founder of Farm Action, a nonprofit that works against agricultural consolidation, believes Vilsack is an example of the ways regulations have been delayed or stymied because of the close nature between the federal government and industry
Farm Action Calls for FTC Rulemaking on Right to Repair
Farm Action submitted a public comment on Friday requesting that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiate a rulemaking process on consumers’ right to repair. Farm Action’s comment explored the anticompetitive nature of repair restrictions “in the context of the harms inflicted by consolidated farm equipment manufacturers on farmers, independent farm equipment repair shops, and rural economies.”
Farm Action’s comment illustrated how farm equipment manufacturers use repair restrictions to extend their excessive market power over the original equipment manufacture market to the repair market. The comment was submitted in support of a petition, put forth by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund (U.S. PIRG) and iFixit, calling for a rulemaking under Section 5 of the FTC Act.
“FTC has the authority and the responsibility to regulate this conduct under existing antitrust law,” Farm Action’s comment said. After documenting how repair restrictions violate Section 5, the comment stated that the conduct of farm equipment manufacturers like John Deere, “is clearly coercive, exploitative, and abusive.”
“[M]anufacturers put farmers in [an] impossible position — wait days or even weeks to have the equipment repaired at any cost because of the control the equipment manufacturer has over the repair business, or replace an otherwise-functioning and costly asset,” the comment said.
“By preventing anyone but authorized dealerships from working on the equipment, equipment manufacturers are also obstructing independent competitors’ access to the market for aftermarket repairs,” the comment continued. “This has led to the widespread shuttering of independent repair shops in rural communities, dealing an additional blow to economies already decimated by decades of concentration and disinvestment.
Noting FTC’s recent commitment to enforcing violations under Section 5 as expressed in its November 2022 policy statement, Farm Action said, “we are respectfully encouraging the Commission to act in accordance with its founding statutes and carry out its publicly-expressed intention to exercise its authority against unfair conduct.”
Media Contact: Dee Laninga, dlaninga@farmaction.us, 202-450-0094
RECENT NEWS
What Would More Trump Tariffs Mean for Food and Farmers?
There has been widespread pushback against these proposed tariffs, with leading economists agreeing that Trump’s plan to impose hefty tariffs on imported goods would likely send prices surging.
Civil Eats | For Contract Farmers, the Election Could Change Everything—or Nothing at All
“The FTC and DOJ [Department of Justice] now have much stronger guidelines. Over time, I think that’s going to make a big difference, regardless of who’s president,” Farm Action president Angela Huffman said.
Investigate Midwest | Ag Secretary Vilsack Deflects on Future Career Plans, Regulatory ‘Revolving Door’
Joe Maxwell, co-founder of Farm Action, a nonprofit that works against agricultural consolidation, believes Vilsack is an example of the ways regulations have been delayed or stymied because of the close nature between the federal government and industry