Farm Action Tells USDA: Save Geographical Labeling for Upcoming “Product of U.S.A.” Rule
Today, Family Farm Action Alliance submitted public comments to the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Comments addressed the Proposed Rulemaking (PR) to expand the list of generic statements a company can make on a food label without those statements being approved by FSIS. Currently, statements — like allergens or religious considerations — fall under FSIS’s generic label prior approval system, which means producers do not need express approval from FSIS to print these claims on their labels.
This proposed rule would expand prior approval generic labeling to the following criteria, allowing these statements to be added to labels without FSIS approval:
Labels on products for export that deviate from FSIS requirements;
Labels that list ingredients in the ingredients statement as being “organic” under the Agricultural Marketing Service National Organic Program;
Labels that display geographic landmarks, such as a foreign country flag, monument, or map;
Labels that make “negative” claims identifying the absence of certain ingredients or types of ingredients;
Labels of products that receive voluntary, not mandatory, FSIS inspection (exotic species for example).
Family Farm Action Alliance opposes the inclusion of “geographic landmarks” (criterion 3) in the final version of the PR. This is because FSIS’s upcoming “Product of USA” label claim rulemaking will directly address “geographic landmark” label requirements for meat and meat products.
Family Farm Action Alliance will submit thorough input and comments to strengthen the integrity of “Product of USA” label claims for meat and poultry products. Including “geographic landmark” claims in this current FSIS rule, and quickly changing those criteria again, would add compliance burdens on processing plant personnel, and unnecessary market strife for independent US farmers and ranchers.
“Our supporters rely on the reinstatement of sound inspection of “Product of U.S.A.” and Country of Origin Label claims by FSIS. Unfortunately if geographic claims stay on the table in this PR, it would only add confusion to an already contentious and complex labeling arena for meat and poultry products. We look forward to taking on geographic label claim changes in the upcoming FSIS “Product of U.S.A.” label rulemaking,” said Emily Miller, Policy and Research Manager at Family Farm Action Alliance.
Family Farm Action Alliance recommended no other changes to the remaining criteria in the PR, and is eager to contribute to FSIS’s upcoming “Product of U.S.A.” rulemaking.
“This ruling weakens protections for farmers, farmworkers, and the public, and it sets a dangerous precedent for other corporations seeking similar immunity,” said Farm Action President Angela Huffman.
“While increasing foreign beef imports may appear to offer a straightforward solution to high consumer prices, an import-driven strategy fails to address the underlying structural challenges facing the U.S. cattle sector,” Farm Action’s report states.
Farm Action Tells USDA: Save Geographical Labeling for Upcoming “Product of U.S.A.” Rule
Today, Family Farm Action Alliance submitted public comments to the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS). Comments addressed the Proposed Rulemaking (PR) to expand the list of generic statements a company can make on a food label without those statements being approved by FSIS. Currently, statements — like allergens or religious considerations — fall under FSIS’s generic label prior approval system, which means producers do not need express approval from FSIS to print these claims on their labels.
This proposed rule would expand prior approval generic labeling to the following criteria, allowing these statements to be added to labels without FSIS approval:
Family Farm Action Alliance opposes the inclusion of “geographic landmarks” (criterion 3) in the final version of the PR. This is because FSIS’s upcoming “Product of USA” label claim rulemaking will directly address “geographic landmark” label requirements for meat and meat products.
Family Farm Action Alliance will submit thorough input and comments to strengthen the integrity of “Product of USA” label claims for meat and poultry products. Including “geographic landmark” claims in this current FSIS rule, and quickly changing those criteria again, would add compliance burdens on processing plant personnel, and unnecessary market strife for independent US farmers and ranchers.
“Our supporters rely on the reinstatement of sound inspection of “Product of U.S.A.” and Country of Origin Label claims by FSIS. Unfortunately if geographic claims stay on the table in this PR, it would only add confusion to an already contentious and complex labeling arena for meat and poultry products. We look forward to taking on geographic label claim changes in the upcoming FSIS “Product of U.S.A.” label rulemaking,” said Emily Miller, Policy and Research Manager at Family Farm Action Alliance.
Family Farm Action Alliance recommended no other changes to the remaining criteria in the PR, and is eager to contribute to FSIS’s upcoming “Product of U.S.A.” rulemaking.
Media Contact: Angela Huffman, [email protected]
RECENT NEWS
Supreme Court Sides With Bayer-Monsanto, Shields Pesticide Companies From Accountability
“This ruling weakens protections for farmers, farmworkers, and the public, and it sets a dangerous precedent for other corporations seeking similar immunity,” said Farm Action President Angela Huffman.
Farm Action Responds to Senate Farm Bill
Farm Action President Angela Huffman said while there are some wins in the Senate’s farm bill, it still misses the mark for America’s farmers.
Progressive Farmer | Farm Action Offers a White Paper to Rebuild the Cattle Herd While Lowering Beef Prices
“While increasing foreign beef imports may appear to offer a straightforward solution to high consumer prices, an import-driven strategy fails to address the underlying structural challenges facing the U.S. cattle sector,” Farm Action’s report states.